Crossover in the Anime World

Will humans eventually abandon their bodies in the future?

After listening to Duran's words, Mark realized that this was not the future, but had already happened. Thirty boys and girls had already been transformed. What will happen in the future? unimaginable.

But Mark didn't ask any more questions. It was useless to ask. After all, everyone has their own choice about the future.

In order for everyone to accept their choice, they need to do nothing but do everything, which is too difficult. Mark asked himself that he could fight, but there was no way he could finish things quietly like Downey and make a choice for mankind.

The gap is too big.

Mark looked at the strong wind outside and the busy dust people in the wind. In a trance, he felt that the people outside had become monsters and the lighthouse had become a monster's lair. He feels that he cannot transcend human aesthetics and human stereotypes.

“It’s such a luxury to think about the future.”

Dulan thought that Mark should watch "The Song of Shaye". The male and female protagonists in it were very interesting. The female protagonist was a beautiful girl in the eyes of the male protagonist, but she was a monster in the eyes of others. While the male protagonist sees others as monsters, only the female protagonist is a beautiful girl.

What exactly is aesthetics?

What exactly is beauty?

Love yourself first, not allocate to yourself first. To love others is not to distribute to others.

Let Yan Bing say that love is not the basis of distribution, and benevolence is not distribution.

In addition to that kind of aesthetics, it is necessary to reflect the beauty of nature, but to show the ideal beauty. Nature is ideal, so the artist has to make up for it. Of course, if the expectation of beauty is dominated by artists, there will be a phenomenon where the artist teaches the audience aesthetics and accepts beauty according to the audience's head. Because the direction of compensating for nature is the artist's preconceived notion, I don't think that my compensation is beyond the beauty of nature. Any such intention is a slander against beauty, and it is the audience who understands beauty.

Compared with love, benevolence is more difficult to understand. Distributing only oneself is not benevolence, and distributing a small family is not benevolence.

There are all problems in Mark's mind. He thinks that everyone has turned into monsters, and he is the only abnormal person. Then he will not be the real ugly monster, right?

When artists create, should they be realistic or abstract? Should they restore the scenery to the greatest extent, or should they create something incredible and incomprehensible?

But even if an artist reaches two realms, there is still no problem. This is not due to information gap. If we perceive beauty in our hearts, we will definitely be able to create it. Even if we create it, the audience will definitely understand it.

Of course, there are also some philosophers who think that the following statements are all nonsense. What is the beauty of nature? Nature is not without imperfections. The goal of the artist is to complete the beauty of nature, to complete the 'expectation of beauty', and to transcend nature. What the artist creates should be the 'ideal apple', not something that the audience will feel like eating after just one glance. When I'm full, it's time to look at other apples.

Therefore, artists want to teach the audience what beauty is, and the audience will choose according to their own needs.

Why do so few people think squinting looks bad and Down syndrome looks bad? Because we form the "prediction of beauty" in our hearts, when we create, we will naturally create in that direction, and think that we are complementing nature, and that our beauty surpasses nature.

Mark smiled bitterly and said: "Although it is not funny, it is not unfounded worry, but it is not over yet. In the future, many people may become monsters that you can't understand, just to be able to live in the Mana ecosystem." Survive.”

Whether the artist creates natural beauty that removes human desires or complements the ideal beauty of nature, the audience has no idea.

Mark didn't hide anything and shared his thoughts with Qiang Jin.

Ran Bing saw his lover's confusion and asked why.

It's like the artist wrote a novel about sex, but the audience didn't think it was a novel. There is nothing the author can do.

The love that lasts until death is so strong: "What is love? Is it the hormones in your body, the endocrine of the cerebellum, the fluctuations of the soul, or the mutual attraction of the essence of life?"

Ran Bing also thought about what would happen if he became a monster. Everything he valued would be shattered, and even love would become incomprehensible.

Mark answered yes.

Mark has obviously learned that kind of thing. He first forgets that "apples are inedible" and then appreciates them. The best thing to do is to forget that "Dulan can't be kissed, hugged or held down" before appreciating Duran. Therefore, my aesthetics is the aesthetics of human desire, and it is not divorced from high-level taste.

When I think about those questions, I suddenly feel that human emotions are very hypocritical.

Ran Bing must have turned into a monster, and he must have suffered as well.

So Ran Bing became a monster, it was you who became ugly, but your beauty changed, but the changes are away from the original, and the beauty of nature is still the same. The heart is looking at it based on human desires. Ran Bing is indeed ugly, but looking at it based on human desires, there is no other kind of beauty.

Feelings in the heart, creating in the hands, and understood by the audience, there is no information gap in every link. The art that the audience sees in the first place is completely consistent with what the artist wants to express.

That kind of beauty is pure beauty without desire, just like an apple. It must be an apple in nature. The audience may feel hungry after watching it. In this way, the artist's work must show the pure beauty of the apple, and the audience will only think that it is an apple, but a kind of food.

Does it appeal to each eye, or is there a rigid standard of beauty?

As for aesthetics, Qiang Jin knows that aesthetics is also divided into two parts, one is the artist and the other is the audience. There is no information gap between the artist and the audience. The content displayed by the artist means that the audience can understand it.

Those are two ideas about artistic creation, one is pure natural beauty, and the other is the ultimate ideal beauty.

As for what love is, if it is a fusion of very simple factors, it can be answered by one reason. It has nothing to do with your own education, your own aesthetics, or your own personality. Of course, it has nothing to do with the hormones in your body. Several reasons ultimately determine the scope and direction of love.

From now on, your love for Mark will be love. If you become a monster, will it turn into love for ingredients? The woman who loved her to death became a delicious food.

The artist may want to express a tragedy, but the audience thinks it is a comedy.

The pressure is very small, and the thought of human beings becoming beautiful in the future makes me feel bad.

Therefore, in the eyes of the audience, each one is attracted to his own eyes, and there are only one thousand Hamlet in one thousand viewers. Because the audience appreciates the work from their own point of view, they see the work from the artist's point of view, and the audience is like a roundworm outside the artist's belly.

It’s not that ‘the observer is the desire, and the desirer is the observation’. Aesthetics has no desire and is simple.

The Mohist disciples called the Confucianists beasts, because Confucianists love themselves first before loving others, so they are beasts. But science has proven that human beings are not animals or beasts, so the Mohist school has made mistakes, the Confucian school has also made mistakes, and all small schools have made mistakes.

She doesn’t even have small eyes or long eyelashes outside her natural appearance? This is not a flaw in the little nature, it is all about squinting, which is what completes nature.

Yan Bing believes that it was Xin Dulan who turned into a monster. Mark cannot see the natural beauty of an artist, give up human desires, and just purely appreciate the way nature shapes life. Of course, I can definitely change my ‘beauty expectations’ and my preconceived notions, and I can accept my monster boyfriend.

If you think you are beautiful and others think you are ugly, is it your fault or someone else’s fault?

Some philosophers believe that artists should follow a standard of beauty derived from nature when creating, and artists should show pure beauty.

Therefore, we need to change our ‘expectations of beauty’, throw away human desires, and simply appreciate the beauty of nature. Since monsters are born from nature, they must have no beauty of their own, waiting for humans like Mark to discover it.

It does not mean that the ultimate goal of the artist is to remove the audience's desires, allowing the audience to discover pure beauty and badness, and have a dialogue with natural regression without desire.

"Do you think he thinks too little?" Ran Bing said.