Police Detective

In Bai Song's opinion, there are too many loopholes and clues in this case.

When you try to cover up one clue, you tend to leave more clues behind.

The first is, since the communication between this contact person and the driver is not through phone calls, etc., then what is the communication through? According to common sense, if you want to hit Bai Song's car, you must get the information as soon as possible and then prepare to catch up. Otherwise, if the information is a few minutes behind, you will not be able to catch up.

The second is, how did the contact person know that the driver had dinner at the hotel? Why did you rush over to destroy the video today? Why didn’t I know yesterday or the day before yesterday?

What did the person who secretly destroyed the surveillance equipment do today?

The third is that the car has been professionally modified. Who did this? It is impossible for someone without some level of auto repair to do this. Moreover, ordinary auto repair shops would not dare to do this kind of modification if they were given money.

This is not to change anything else, but to change the brakes to malfunction. This is simply a joke. Therefore, this car must have been modified where it was parked, and it could not have been driven here after modification. The driver's previous parking spot has also been found, and a lot of evidence was left at the scene.

The fourth thing is, who changed the car’s seat belt? These are two different things. The driver doesn't want to die, and he's not stupid if the seat belt is broken or looks broken.

Bai Song will not underestimate anyone, even the dead driver, he is definitely not a fool. Therefore, he had no doubt that there was no superficial problem with the car's seat belt the moment he fastened it.

It wasn't until after the violent collision that the car's seat belt had a problem. This was also a technical job. And it is probably not the same group of people who changed the brakes before, because this time the modification is to avoid the driver.

fifth

What era has it been, and you still dare to play like this?

Is this treating the police as fools? Perhaps in the eyes of non-professionals, this is the so-called perfect crime, but there are a lot of loopholes, and every time someone tries to erase a new loophole, it will either leave new evidence loopholes or new logic. loopholes.

Analyzing one by one, in terms of contact information, there may be several, and the most likely way is to contact directly. In other words, the location of the contact is a location that the driver can see, and the two people are directly contacted through gestures, etc.

Combining the car's parking spot, Bai Song and everyone analyzed the building structure of the community. If the contact person needs to be able to see Baisong's parking spot and the driver's parking spot at the same time, there are not many places to choose from. Team Li will arrange it directly. Two people went to the scene.

Regarding the matter of someone sabotaging surveillance today, this person's information is now on the desks of several people.

"There is something wrong with this man. I don't look like a normal person." Someone put forward the point of view: "We need to give him a mental evaluation."

"Well, that must be done." Team Li agreed.

"Yes, yes, we have to do it." Someone echoed: "I'm going to report to the Qin detachment right now."

"No need." Captain Li raised his hand to stop him, "Don't worry, there will definitely be arrangements from the Qin detachment."

This man's name is Wang Shujun. He is a farmer from Gan Province. He is in his 40s and has been in Tianhua City for a while. He is a part-time worker and is very uncooperative with the police. The police asked him questions and they didn't know anything. They asked him why he wanted to sabotage the surveillance. His theory was that he wanted to steal something, but there was nothing to steal and he was afraid of being discovered, so he destroyed the surveillance.

It seems to everyone that this person will not be the contact person, but more likely that someone hired him to do this, and he probably made some promises.

This person is stupid and stubborn, and he probably took the money and was taken advantage of.

Sometimes, it is difficult for a person like this to be taken seriously anywhere, but once someone shows kindness to him, he is easily moved. Regarding his analysis, everyone generally believes that the person who hired him paid a lot of money, which was enough for him to be willing to bear the risk of being caught.

If it was just intentional damage to property, this matter would be considered an ordinary criminal case, not even a criminal case. Therefore, even if this person is caught by the police, he will probably be detained for a maximum of 7 to 15 days.

If it is a public security case, public security detention is the penalty, and the maximum time for a single case is 15 days; for a criminal case, the maximum time is 7 days, and after 7 days, you will either be arrested or released.

An arrest is impossible, the case is too small.

According to Article 122 of the Criminal Procedure Law: the period during which a criminal suspect undergoes a psychiatric evaluation is not included in the time limit for handling the case.

In other words, if the seven days of criminal detention are regarded as a seven-day hourglass counting down, then once the psychiatric evaluation is started, the hourglass will stop and start again when the evaluation results are available.

Everyone analyzed it and found that once the imprisoned person is detained for more than fifteen days, he will definitely have great distrust of his "employer". This matter is much simpler.

From the game with the opponent, it can be seen that the opponent handles many details very well and knows how to destroy evidence. but,

Wherever you walk, you leave traces - Edmond Rocca.

There was once a hot topic: if a professional criminal investigation expert committed a crime, would it be possible to complete the perfect crime?

There is actually an answer to this question, it’s impossible.

This is like asking, is it possible for top doctors and academician-level experts to understand all medical skills?

The same goes for criminal investigation experts. The further you go in an industry, the more specialized you will become. Maybe a footprint expert can handle his own footprints perfectly, but he may not be able to handle other clues as well.

Next is the issue of repairing the car. During the repair and modification process of such a large car, as well as at the parking site, many traces were found. In terms of technique, this person has some tricks, but there are many flaws.

In other words, the damage to the car's braking system was most likely caused by working at night and poor lighting conditions.

What is the nature of destroying these things?

As long as these car repairmen know a little bit about the law, it is impossible for them to engage in this behavior.

Let’s talk about the act of damaging the brakes first. If the repairman knew that the driver was going to kill someone, then he would be an accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide; of course, he most likely did not know it, so according to the first paragraph of Article 119 of the Criminal Law, he would have committed the crime of damaging transportation and had already caused Serious consequences, this situation, the prison term is exactly the same as intentional homicide.

Let’s talk about the act of breaking the seat belt. This is definitely an accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide.

Bai Song couldn't help but feel helpless for these people. How much money would be appropriate for such a big crime?

Let’s do a little analysis first. It’s very tiring to write this kind of chapter.

Please recommend monthly tickets, hehe