Superstar

ads_wz_txt;

After the renewed 505 ‘intensive’ controversy 　　 sit-in demonstrations, the “Schindler’s List” suspected of beautifying the Nazis was pushed to a brand new climax. In fact, the reason why this incident has become a social hot spot is certainly not because of the activity of extreme Jewish groups, but because of the social and political changes represented by the Jews in the United States, which triggered heated discussions from all sides.

However, if there are statements that support extreme Jewish groups, there will naturally be opposition. This has led to the public opinion of the entire society, like a volcanic eruption, continuously blowing out.

Frank. Harvard University’s Department of Sociology believes, “There were indeed many Nazis who were heinous demons and needed humane destruction to eliminate them, but a large number of people were forced by the war, the Nazis, and the environment of the entire era. It’s like in a concentration camp, some Jews manage and even persecute their compatriots in order to become Nazi minions. This is a truth. Therefore, in the movie, Schindler said that war can make people’s hearts darkest. The part of the call came out, and the background of the whole war brewed one tragedy after another.

Leaving aside the real A'mon-Goss in history, the Goss shown in the movie is only real, not beautified. Goss represents ordinary people in the entire war environment. His inner struggles and contradictions are conflicts that any normal person can produce. In fact, this kind of conflict is in Stein, Schindler, and those who become Nazi minions. It happened to the Jews. It's just that everyone's choices are different, and Goss chose to use blood to vent his inner pain.

Goss is not beautified in the movie. On the contrary, Goss chose to kill at the end of the contradiction, which also proves that Goss chose to embark on this path. Maybe Goss in the movie is not as cold-blooded as the real Goss in history, but there is no doubt that both are demons. So when Goss was finally executed, the audience did not regret it, but was calm and even cheerful. This is the proof.

As for the so-called "beautification", it is actually just a discussion of the director's "sex" of people. It belongs to the category of art and cannot be generalized. Just like in life, we don't choose a pistol instead of a serial killer when he kills. Cut the veins, say that he is benevolent; nor because of a drug addict. A drug addict helps an old'milk' to cross the road, and thinks that he is beautiful. The same is true for Goss. On the contrary, the director is right. Goss’s discussion may not be in line with real historical figures, but it is in line with the entire historical background. This is the most important thing."

It is not just Frank who is a guest, the influence of "Schindler's List" has apparently crossed the ocean and reached the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, and there has also been a whirlwind on the European continent, from the University of Leeds (uy.of.leeds) and'Bo'. The well-known sociologist Zyg "Meng" Bowman (Zygmuan) of the University of Warsaw (uy.of.warsaw) also expressed his support for Steven Spielberg. This paper will be elaborated.

"Historical research and psychological research on the Holocaust show that most of the executioners who carried out the massacre at that time were normal people. There is no fact that the Holocaust could be interpreted as a natural criminal, a sadist, a'spiritual' patient, or any other moral person. A crime committed by a deficient individual. The cruel "sex" of a person on the whole has little relationship with the individual "sex" of the executor, but it is very closely related to the social structure that regards power and obedience as the norm. From the origin, the cruel social'sex' factor is far greater than the individual's'sex' personality factor. In a social situation where moral pressure is lacking rather than the legalization of human sex, more individuals tend to be cruel.

The Holocaust shocks our souls most. Perhaps it is not that the fate of being slaughtered may also fall on us, but the thought that we might also go to the slaughter; in the past we might have done this, but if we had the right conditions, we still might now. this way.

A'mon'-Goss' execution of the massacre came from obedience and also from the general trend of the war. He was only seeking survival in the entire cruel war environment. As for the cold blood and cruelty that Goss displayed, it was the result of the dark side of human nature being catalyzed by the war.

On the other hand, Goss will produce contradictions and conflicts. This is the individual's independent thinking under the social background. This has a certain inevitable'ness'. Even if it is a cold-blooded animal, it is still an individual with the ability to think. Thinking: What is the reason for doing this. Especially when his thoughts are shocked—for example, when he falls in love with a Jewish ‘maid’ servant, this kind of thinking will become more and more ‘aggressive’.

There is no doubt that the shaping of Goss in the movie is correct, because this is the result that will inevitably lead to the background of the entire era. The director focused the human'sex' and cruel struggles in the war on Goss Point' "Lose" is reflected in his body, which precisely reflects the director's attitude towards the entire war: people are always small in front of the war machine, and the tragedy in Goss is the tragedy of the entire era. Schindler awakened human'sex', while Goss was overwhelmed and crushed by the cruelty of society.

In a system where rationality and morality run counter to morality, most people can easily disregard their moral responsibilities and choose the criteria of reasonable interest and self-preservation; self-preservation takes precedence over moral responsibility, no matter what. Predestined, some people always choose the latter, even if the number of people is small. This shows that evil is not omnipotent, and it also shows that submission or resistance, in the final analysis, is the result of a person's choice.

Under the nobility of the Nazi tyranny, many people lost their sense of morality and humanity. In the face of the absolute fact of being overwhelmed, no one can be declared guilty, but no one can forgive his moral submission. He should be ashamed of his own weakness. Only by constantly maintaining this sense of shame and facing up to one's own weakness can it be possible to break the old dragons imposed on people by tyranny such as the Holocaust, including the material and ‘spiritual’ ones.

Schindler maintained a sense of shame and faced weakness; Goss maintained a sense of shame, but lost to weakness. This is the deepest connotation of "Schindler's List", and it is also the core content of the story that the director has given the most alert to the world. "

The argument between the supporters and the opposition is so fierce, it can almost be said to have fallen into a fever pitch, so that since December 2nd, variety shows, news programs, and radio programs have launched lively discussions, and people from all walks of life have been Invited to express their opinions and opinions on the program. From sociologists to university professors, from historians to social observers, from Jewish groups to black and Asian groups, all stood up and expressed their opinions. This almost made "Sinder" Le’s list" has become a social phenomenon.

Of course, in addition to support and opposition, there are naturally neutrals. It is not that accurate to say that it is neutral. Their point is very simple: this is a film, not a documentary, and there is no need to be so true.

The neutrals believe that Steven has restored history as much as possible. Even if he digs a bit more about the description of A'mon-Goss, it does not beautify it. On the contrary, he vividly describes the **** Nazi. The cruelty of the officer. Many Jews who have really experienced the suffering of concentration camps and finally survived saw A'mon-Goss on the big screen. They were frightened, not to mention those other audiences who were scared by the direct and cruel blood and sweated behind them. .

Therefore, the conclusion of the neutrals is: pure nonsense!

But no matter what the neutrals think, the struggle between the support and the opposition has become a social hot spot. Originally, "Schindler's list" has been the focus of society in the past two weeks, whether it is the praise of film critics or two consecutive weeks. The excellent box office performance of the show has made people full of curiosity and expectations for this movie. At this time, with the conflict of these statements, "Schindler's List" is almost comparable to the presidential election, and it has become the focus of everyone's talk more or less after dinner.

Under such circumstances, as a director, Steven Spielberg had to stand up and express his position for the first time, "As a Jew, I feel the same for Schindler’s story. I believe I, from any point of view, I can’t beautify A’mon-Goss or other Nazis. Even if I’m a director, I won’t change this fact. I’m just standing on one side as much as possible. From the standpoint of a calm onlooker, the history is presented to the audience. The argument about A'mon-Goss is unnecessary in my opinion, because even if Goss is struggling and contradictory, he will still not change. The fact of murdering the devil, all the choices he made are also the direct guidance of his final outcome."

Steven appeared to be very "excited", even a little too "excited" to make his face flushed. No one knows better than him about his contribution to this film, but now he is discredited by someone saying that he is beautified.' Mon' Goss, this is simply unforgivable. What's more, the accusations of those extreme Jewish groups, even though Steven knew that they were too extreme and their thoughts were the product of incitement, they still made Steven very concerned and very sad. The period of filming "Schindler's List" was a torment for Steven. He personally revisited the difficulties experienced by his compatriots back then. It was more painful than killing him, but now, he His sincerity was questioned, which made Steven almost unable to control his emotions.

But in the end, Steven forced himself to calm down, "I don’t know if those who said I beautify Goss have seen this movie. If not, I hope you will go into the cinema to watch this movie. You will know what the facts are; if you have already watched it, I hope you can seriously recall the plot of the movie and feel the real emotion I injected into this movie. Everything speaks with facts, and I have a clear conscience!"

Steven’s "excitement" has also been supported by Hugo~www.wuxiaspot.com~ As the actor of A'mon-Goss, Hugo obviously has also been under tremendous pressure, although there is no such pressure. Steven is so serious, but the shackles on his shoulders are more profound-after all, he is the actor of the role! "I must emphasize that the cold blood and cruelty of A'mon-Goss is beyond doubt. He has experienced struggles, contradictions, and pain, but this is like something that any person will experience under the background of war. He is at least a person, not a beast who can’t think, so he has this reaction: Normal. But even so, this will not obliterate the crime he committed. So, I hope everyone can look at this movie with the right eyes. Our entire crew has devoted countless efforts to this movie. Please don’t ignore it. ."

After saying this, Hugo seemed to have thought of something, frowning and saying, "I don't know who the source of this statement is, but I sincerely hope that the person who said these words in the first place can go into the cinema to watch it. In this movie, I think you will find the answer."

This unintentional remark brought the media's focus to the culprit again. Who was the first to start this war?

(To be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Chuangshi Chuangshi to vote for the first recommendation and monthly pass. Your support is my biggest motivation.)