The Greatest Showman

1928 Controversial vortex

Remember in one second [End of the God Station] Mobile phone user input address: m.xinwanben.com

"San Francisco Chronicle," 50.

Los Angeles Times, 40.

"Village Voice", 60 points.

The Guardian, 50.

When I saw the unqualified scores, I couldn't believe that this was actually a cooperation project of "Nolanga Hall", which was shocking.

In addition, there is the "Variety" magazine, which also gave a 60-point evaluation.

"The film could have unfolded in many ways, but unfortunately, Nolan chose to present this ambitious project in the most boring and minimal way, completely lost in the vastness and infinity of space. Of these, not even Hall's advanced performances can save the banality and cheesy at the heart of the theme.

Is Nolan's understanding of family love only to this extent? Or, is Nolan's film language insufficient to show the complexity and depth of human nature? Is the director who filmed 'The Dark Knight' still alive? The only good thing is that those self-talking in space can't be heard on Earth. "

From the serious bad reviews of "Playlist", "Interstellar" is being chased and blocked by film critics. Severe criticisms are endless, and you can clearly feel the hatred from industry insiders. For Nolan's story core And the subject direction is completely disagreeable.

If you look closely at the film reviews, you can see that the criticism mainly comes from disappointment and gaps.

Science fiction films such as "2001 A Space Odyssey" and "Blade Runner" can withstand the test of time and eventually become classics in film history. The main reason is the discussion of human nature. The exploration of human nature between machines has undoubtedly raised the ideological core of the film to a whole new level.

But "Interstellar" puts all its focus on..."Power generation with love". From the perspective of the depth and breadth of thinking, this is definitely a serious miss. Although at the end of the film, Renly once again used the performance to regain a city, giving the theme more possibilities to extend; but from the reunion of Cooper and Murphy, the whole story has lost the possibility of deep thinking, not to mention the test of time. , and now you can see the essence of its "soap opera".

This is definitely not the space epic one would expect.

It seems that this is the most severe criticism attack on Renly's work since the "detachment". To be precise, even the "detachment" has not faced such a fierce attack - at least, "detachment" is an author's film , whether the film critics like it or not, they also know that the director is not trying to please the audience; but "Interstellar" is a commercial film, and the communication with the audience is undoubtedly the most important, which also makes the film critics full of firepower.

So, does this mean that Renly's "Waterloo" just appeared?

Sadly, the haters will have to wait a bit longer.

The ferocity of the negative reviews, the embarrassment and disappointment of the middle reviews, were all drowned out in the cheers and applause of the positive reviews. There were 38 positive reviews, which sounded the sailing horn of the "Interstellar Crossing" media comprehensive review!

The New York Times, One Hundred, "Is it another '2001: A Space Odyssey'? Apparently not! 'Interstellar' just tells a very light and very personal story that puts all the weight on' On the theme of "Love and Sacrifice", it brought the heaviest and most profound emotional collision in 2014! Nolan brought a more sincere emotional bond experience than "Inception"."

"The Hollywood Reporter," One Hundred, "I can predict that many people will compare this film next to '2001: A Space Odyssey,' which is actually a compliment; but sadly, it's not another An 'Odyssey', and Nolan is not another Kubrick. Nolan tells a story of returning to his homeland in his own way, crossing the obstacles of time and space, leaving aside the discussion of human nature and divinity, It is a sincere account of the most real and closest bonds of human beings.”

The original English name of "2001: A Space Odyssey" is "2001: A Space Odyssey", which draws on the second half of Homer's epic "Odyssey" story to deduce a space adventure; now, "Interstellar" also tells an Odyssey That's why the "Hollywood Reporter" has such a story.

"Chicago Sun," One Hundred, "Undoubtedly, this is the best sci-fi movie of the new century, a thrilling space adventure to think about the meaning of life and the meaning of family, and even further explore the relationship between human beings and society. The relationship between them has given a new vitality to space science fiction movies from another perspective! The actors headed by Hall, Hathaway and Chastain gave wonderful performances, which made the story full of countless charms, which are worth chewing. There is no Doubt, this is a masterpiece!"

"Empire", 100%, "One of the most wonderful movies to watch in the new century! Full of wisdom! Full of special effects! Full of reflection and precipitation! Almost equivalent to Stephen Hawking's 'Star Trek': a scene that happened in The space opera inside the brain, and then interprets the changes of the soul in time and space, perfectly combining science and human nature! The most surprising part is still Renly Hall, whose unique touch endows the characters and movies Amazing charisma, who else could say 'no' to him?"

"Daily Telegraph", 100%, "This is Nolan's most ambitious and outstanding work so far! A high degree of combination of technology and ideas! Really serve all scientific theories and shooting skills to emotions, Characters! Characters! Characters! That's the core of the whole movie,

And then give full play to the unique charm of the strong cast and cast, which is definitely enough to rank among the best in the new century, a masterpiece not to be missed! "

One hundred.

One hundred.

Still one percent.

There are as many as ten media that have given full marks, including the absolutely authoritative media in the industry such as "The New York Times" and "The Hollywood Reporter". Basically, the number of perfect scores from ten professional media is exactly the same as the number of media that gave middle reviews. In other words, how many media are dissatisfied, so how many media can give perfect praise without reservation.

It can be clearly seen that the most dissatisfied part of the media is the "emotion" part. The continuous rendering of too soap operas and too sensational completely destroys the depth and heaviness of science fiction movies - in fact, this can also be regarded as "" The difference between "hard sci-fi" and "soft sci-fi" is that hard sci-fi always has more possibilities for discussion at the technical level, so it has the possibility of extending and expanding at the levels of artificial intelligence, human nature and divinity.

"Gravity" can be regarded as a half example. This work cannot be regarded as hard science fiction, but the core discussion on the origin of life has the possibility of sublimation and interpretation, so it has been unanimously praised by film critics; "Interstellar Crossing" "On the contrary, it can be said that the gods have returned to the human world.

The full-score media just recognized the "soft sci-fi" part. They believed that this was Nolan's discussion of human nature. Although it was a little cliché and a little simple, it also completed the transition from sci-fi to emotion. A sublimation that should be a return, allowing the audience to find resonance.

Is "2001 A Space Odyssey" a classic? Yes! But that doesn't mean all sci-fi movies need to move in the direction of "2001: A Space Odyssey."

The same factor, in the eyes of some people is a disadvantage, in the eyes of some people is an advantage, this is the difference.

In addition to ten full-scoring media, 28 other media have given positive reviews, and the scoring range has continued from 70 points to 95 points. The span can still be felt from the side. The heated debate it sparked, the ambiguity of the viewing experience was indeed a mixed bag.

"Vanity Fair", ninety-five points, "Unexpectedly, 'Interstellar' has become a wild beast in the primitive jungle of Hollywood, the grand picture presents an epic sense, and the delicate emotion awakens resonance, seemingly light And the simple narrative of fetters has caused a lot of reflection. Although I know this is a commonplace, but... Renly Hall is still the core of the whole film, and his performance lights up the big screen again!"

"New York Post", Ninety Points, "Like all the successful science fiction films of the past, Christopher Nolan uses powerful visual language and visual effects to create a space adventure that finally reflects all the mirror images to humans. In myself, I examine myself through science fiction. Although Nolan's discussion topic this time is a bit narrow, the depth and complexity of it has been pleasantly surprised, and it is more sincere than any previous work."

"Totally Movie", 88 points, "Despite the length of the film being grotesque and the third part completely reduced to a soap opera; it still can't hide the fact that 'Interstellar' is a space opera, it deserves all forms of Praise, truly touching the softness of the heart and the thinking of the soul through images, about human nature and time, and most interestingly, about the fetters and loneliness between individuals and families.

The brilliance and brilliance of this film makes one wonder again: should we pull all the directors and producers of all sci-fi movies into one screening room, and then collectively watch the Stanley Kubrick split- It was already a light-year-old manuscript, but it was still the top existence in the industry. Nolan had only learned half of his skills, and he had already made a candidate for the best science fiction movie in the new century. "

"The Independent Telegraph," 83 points, "full of wisdom and surprises. 'Interstellar' is precisely the kind of work that the contemporary Hollywood industry desperately needs, no matter how much critics hate soap operas and sensational parts, there's no denying it. Yes, it finds a balance between business and art. Nolan has transformed the mysterious space into a children's playground, but every picture of visual effects and sound effects can arouse the audience's thinking, at least , it encourages you to think about time, about family, about loneliness, and about yourself."

Support (end this site) and share this site with those who need it! Can't find the book, please leave a message!

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like